Appeal No. 93-3114 Application 07/825,465 Fusobacterium necrophorum cells are gram-negative bacterial cells (Spec., p. 1, lines 8-14; Maas, Chapter I, Introduction, p. 2, first paragraph). Adams teaches that Fusobacterium necrophorum is responsible for foot rot and liver abscesses and other lesions in ruminant animals (Adams, col. 1, lines 34-51). Adams utilized mice as models for determining the activity of compounds against Fusobacterium necrophorum infection in ruminant animals (Adams, col. 8, Example 2). We conclude that persons having ordinary skill in the art in view of the combined prior art teachings reasonably would have been led to expect success in treating cattle with B-propiolactone-inactivated Fusobacterium necrophorum bacterin to prevent or control foot rot or liver necrosis. We agree with the examiner’s view that a reasonable expectation of success is required and not absolute predictability to sustain a rejection for unpatentability under 35 U.S.C. § 103. Compare In re O’Farrell, 853 F.2d 894, 903, 7 USPQ2d 1673, 1681 (Fed. Cir. 1988). While appellant’s view that persons having ordinary skill in the art would not have been led by the combined prior art - 11 -Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007