Appeal No. 94-0120 Application 07/208,512 � 7(b) ( “The [board] shall . . . review adverse decisions of examiners upon applications for patents . . . .“) Here, the examiner has failed to present a statement of rejection for the broadest claim pending which is susceptible to a meaningful review. It is the examiner’s initial burden to establish reasons of unpatentability. In re Oetiker, 977 F.2d 1443, 1446, 24 USPQ2d 1443, 1445 (Fed. Cir. 1992). The examiner has failed to do so here. Accordingly, the decision of the examiner is reversed. REVERSED SHERMAN D. WINTERS ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) WILLIAM F. SMITH ) BOARD OF PATENT Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND ) INTERFERENCES ) ) FRED E. McKELVEY, Senior ) Administrative Patent Judge ) 6Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007