1THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 17
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte THOMAS F. CORBIN, ALAN C. HANDERMANN, RICHARD KOTEK,
WILLIAM D. PORTER, JACK A. DELLINGER and EDWARD A. DAVIS
____________
Appeal No. 94-0792
Application No. 07/943,7951
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before GARRIS, PAK and WARREN, Administrative Patent Judges.
PAK, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner’s
refusal to allow claims 1 through 14, which are all of the
claims pending in the application. Claim 14 has been amended
1Application for patent filed September 11, 1992.
According to the appellants, the application is a
continuation-in-part of Application No. 07/718,720, filed June
21, 1991, now U.S. Patent No. 5,169,870.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007