Appeal No. 94-0792
Application No. 07/943,795
Having carefully considered those materials, we find
ourselves in agreement with the position succinctly set forth
by appellants in the “argument” section of their Brief,
particularly pages 15 and 16 of their Brief. Accordingly, we
shall adopt that position as our own. For the reasons stated
by appellants in their Brief, we reverse the examiner’s
decision rejecting claims 1 through 14 under 35 U.S.C. § 103.
REVERSED
BRADLEY R. GARRIS )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
CHUNG K. PAK ) APPEALS
Administrative Patent Judge ) AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
CHARLES F. WARREN )
Administrative Patent Judge )
5
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007