THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 35 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte VINOD R. HEGDE, ANN C. HORAN, MAHESH G. PATEL and INGRID-AGNETA GUNNARSSON ____________ Appeal No. 94-1046 Application 07/747,4561 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before CAROFF, WILLIAM F. SMITH, and GRON, Administrative Patent Judges GRON, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL UNDER 35 U.S.C. § 134 Application for patent filed August 12, 1991. According1 to applicants, this application is a continuation of Application 07/590,315, filed September 28, 1990, now abandoned; which is a continuation of Application 07/227,968, filed August 3, 1988, now abandoned. - 1 -Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007