THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 16
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte HUMBERTO B. ARZENO and DAVID J. MORGANS, JR.
________________
Appeal No. 94-2062
Application 07/870,8411
________________
ON BRIEF
________________
Before WEIFFENBACH, ELLIS and OWENS, Administrative Patent
Judges.
OWENS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the examiner’s final rejection of
1Application for patent filed April 20, 1992. According
to appellants, the application is a continuation of
Application 07/094,220, filed September 8, 1987, now
abandoned, which is a continuation-in-part of Application
06/905,827, filed September 10, 1986, now abandoned.
-1-1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007