Appeal No. 94-2081 Application No. 07/809,984 spatial resolution, Figure 4 of Le Gall does, however, show a reduction in spatial resolution when the originating raster characteristics 100 are compared to the receiving raster characteristics 200. Other than the brief mention that the number of bits per pixel can be changed, Le Gall does not state how the change in bits per pixel is accomplished in conversion unit 10. More importantly, Le Gall does not describe the order in which the changes in spatial resolution and data resolution are performed in the conversion unit. The claims on appeal specifically state that changes in the data resolution are performed on the downsampled or spatially reduced image by (1) thresholding the downsampled image to produce a specific number of bits with respect to the originally digitized image or (2) quantizing in accordance with plural quantizing thresholds. Hirabayashi discloses binarization of an image after subsampling (Figures 4, 10 and 14). The reduced pixel values from the subsampling unit are input to the binarization unit and are compared with the threshold value T=0.5 (column 7, lines 18 through 23 and column 8, lines 58 through 60). The comparison of the pixel values with the single threshold value 8Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007