Appeal No. 94-2097 Application 07/875,630 This appeal was taken from the examiner's decision rejecting claims 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 10, 21 and 22, which are all of the claims remaining in the application. REPRESENTATIVE CLAIM Claim 21, which is illustrative of the subject matter on appeal, reads as follows: 21. In a method for treating a warm-blooded vertebrate to stimulate antiviral, antiproliferative and immunomodulatory responses by oral administration of interferon whereby ingested interferon is subjected to the digestive conditions of the digestive tract of the warm-blooded vertebrate, the improvement which comprises administering the interferon orally in solution at about 0.1 to about 1.5 IU/lb of body weight per dose. THE REFERENCES The references relied on by the examiner are: Cummins, Jr. (Cummins) 5,019,382 May 28, 1991 Hasegawa et al. (Hasegawa) 4,675,184 Jun. 23, 1987 (filed Jan. 4, 1984) M. B. Tompkins et al. (Tompkins), "Response of Feline Leukemia Virus-induced Nonregenerative Anemia to Oral Administration of an Interferon-containing Preparation," 12 Feline Practice no. 3, 6-15 (May-June 1982). THE ISSUES The issues presented for review are: (1) whether the examiner erred in entering a provisional rejection of all the appealed claims under the judicially created doctrine of -2-Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007