THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 28
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte HERMANN BIERINGER, ERWIN
HACKER, RUDOLF HEINRICH, HANS-PHILIPP
HUFF and JEAN KOCUR
_____________
Appeal No. 94-2612
Application 07/759,4781
______________
HEARD: March 4, 1998
_______________
Before KIMLIN, GARRIS and WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
examiner’s final rejection of claims 1 through 20, which are
all the claims in this application.
1 Application for patent filed September 13, 1991.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007