Ex parte GLENDENING et al. - Page 2




                     Appeal No. 94-2818                                                                                                                                                
                     Application 07/834,771                                                                                                                                            


                     1993 (Paper No. 10).   These are the only claims in this2                                                                                                                      
                     application.                                                                                                                                                      
                                According to appellants, the invention is directed to a                                                                                                
                     method and apparatus for waste degradation (brief, paragraph                                                                                                      
                     bridging pages 1 and 2).  This degradation is accomplished by                                                                                                     
                     metering a liquid culture medium from a bag through a feed                                                                                                        
                     line into the waste material, where the liquid culture medium                                                                                                     
                     is formed by adding water to the concentrated organisms which                                                                                                     
                     are stored in the bag (Id.).                                                                                                                                      
                                Appellants state that all the claims are ?grouped                                                                                                      
                     together?, i.e., the claims stand or fall together (brief,                                                                                                        
                     page 8). Therefore this decision will be decided on the basis                                                                                                     
                     of claim 1, which is an independent claim and is illustrative                                                                                                     
                     of the subject matter on appeal.  See 37 CFR §                                                                                                                    
                     1.192(c)(5)(1993), now 37 CFR                                                                                                                                     
                     § 1.192(c)(7)(1995).  Claim 1 is reproduced below:                                                                                                                

                                           1.  A method for treating a waste material to                                                                                               
                     degrade the waste material, which comprises:                                                                                                                      


                                2    This amendment was entered as noted in the advisory action dated Sept. 14,                                                                        
                     1993 (Paper No. 11).  An earlier amendment dated July 7, 1993 (Paper No. 7), subsequent                                                                           
                     to the final rejection, was refused entry as noted in the advisory action dated July 23,                                                                          
                     1993 (Paper No. 8).                                                                                                                                               
                                                                                          2                                                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007