THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 13 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte JOHN R. GRANT ____________ Appeal No. 94-2926 Application No. 07/777,0451 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before HAIRSTON, FLEMING, and TORCZON, Administrative Patent Judges. HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1 through 3 and 5. In an Amendment After Final (paper number 5), claim 5 was canceled, and claim 1 was rewritten in a Jepson-type format. Accordingly, claims 1 through 3 remain before us on appeal. 1Application for patent filed October 6, 1991.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007