Ex parte CAPON et al. - Page 15




          Appeal No. 94-3676                                                          
          Application 07/949,327                                                      
          Functional Polypeptides,” Molecular and Cellular Biology, Vol.              
          5, No. 4, pp. 768-779 (Apr. 1985), which was published in                   
          1985, (2) Leung, “The Structure and Bacterial Expression of                 
          Three Distinct Bovine Interferon-J Genes,” Bio/Technology,                  
          Vol. 2, pp. 458-464 (1984), which was published in 1984, and                
          (3) Higashi, “Structure and Expression of a Cloned cDNA for                 
          Mouse Interferon-J,” J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 258, pp. 9522-9529                
          (1983), cited in Leung, which was published in 1983,  are5                       
          intervening publications.  To perfect their claim for priority              
          under 35 U.S.C. § 120 and antedate the teachings of the                     
          aforementioned intervening publications, the specification of               
          Application 06/438,128, filed November 1, 1982, must describe               
          and enable one skilled in the art to make and use the full                  
          scope of the subject matter presently claimed.  See                         
          In re Scheiber, 587 F.2d 59, 62, 199 USPQ 782, 784 (CCPA                    
          1978):                                                                      
               Section 120 . . . concerns only an applicant’s effective               
               filing date . . . and it expressly requires an earlier                 
               application to disclose the claimed subject matter in                  
               compliance with 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph.                      


              5    We have not actually retrieved the Higashi article.               
          However, we are so excited by its title that we recommend that              
          the examiner retrieve the article and consider the patentability            
          of the subject matter claimed in this case over its teaching.               
                                          - 15 -                                      





Page:  Previous  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007