The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 38 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte JAMES L. PATERSON and GREGORY J. ARMSTRONG ____________ Appeal No. 94-3910 Application No. 07/966,6151 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before THOMAS, HAIRSTON and JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent Judges. 1Application for patent filed October 26, 1992. According to appellants, the application is a continuation of Application 07/707,242, filed May 22, 1991, now abandoned; which is a continuation of Application 07/526,961, filed May 22, 1990, now abandoned; which is a continuation of 07/128,549, filed December 3, 1987, now abandoned.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007