THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 20
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte EKKEHARD BEER, HERMANN DALLMAN and HAJO HAGENS
____________
Appeal No. 94-4226
Application No. 07/838,3451
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before GARRIS, WEIFFENBACH, and PAK, Administrative Patent
Judges.
PAK, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on the examiner’s refusal to allow claims
1 through 3, 6, 8 through 10, 12 through 20 and 23 through 25,
which are all of the claims remaining in the application. Claims
1, 6, 8, 9 and 24 have been amended subsequent to final
rejection.
1Application for patent filed February 20, 1992.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007