Ex parte BEER et al. - Page 1




                                  THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                                                

                         The opinion in support of the decision being entered                                                                 
                         today (1) was not written for publication in a law                                                                   
                         journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                                               
                                                                                                         Paper No. 20                         
                                    UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                                 
                                                             ____________                                                                     
                                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                                  
                                                        AND INTERFERENCES                                                                     
                                                             ____________                                                                     
                         Ex parte EKKEHARD BEER, HERMANN DALLMAN and HAJO HAGENS                                                              
                                                             ____________                                                                     
                                                        Appeal No. 94-4226                                                                    
                                                Application No. 07/838,3451                                                                   
                                                             ____________                                                                     
                                                                ON BRIEF                                                                      
                                                             ____________                                                                     
                Before GARRIS, WEIFFENBACH, and PAK, Administrative Patent                                                                    
                Judges.                                                                                                                       
                PAK, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                             
                                                        DECISION ON APPEAL                                                                    
                         This is a decision on the examiner’s refusal to allow claims                                                         
                1 through 3, 6, 8 through 10, 12 through 20 and 23 through 25,                                                                
                which are all of the claims remaining in the application.  Claims                                                             
                1, 6, 8, 9 and 24 have been amended subsequent to final                                                                       
                rejection.                                                                                                                    






                         1Application for patent filed February 20, 1992.                                                                     





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007