Ex parte BEER et al. - Page 3




          Appeal No. 94-4226                                                          
          Application No. 07/838,345                                                  


               24.  A process for producing an article having at least one            
          surface which exhibits antireflection properties, comprising the            
          step of:                                                                    
               a)   transferring to at least one surface of an article, a             
          surface structure of a polymeric film, wherein said polymeric               
          film comprises a thermoplastic material,                                    
               said surface structure comprising individual, randomly                 
          distributed elevations, wherein said elevations rise 0.01 to 15             
          microns above the lowest regions of the surface having the                  
          elevations,                                                                 
               so that the resultant article comprises said surface                   
          structure, wherein said surface structure has a substantially               
          uniform configuration comprising mutually linked individual                 
          structures, wherein said surface structure comprises continually            
          repeating elementary cells which have a mean diameter of about 10           
          to 800 microns,                                                             
               said transferring comprising applying said film to said                
          article as a cover layer wherein a surface of the film comprising           
          said structure faces outward from said article.                             
               The sole reference relied on by the examiner is:                       
          Nishiyama et al. (Nishiyama)       4,937,030      Jun. 26, 1990             
               Claims 1 through 3, 6, 8 through 10, 12 through 20 and 23              
          through 25 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable             
          over the disclosure of Nishiyama.                                           
               We have carefully reviewed the entire record, including                
          conflicting viewpoints advanced by the examiner and appellants in           
          support of their respective positions.  This review leads us to             
          conclude that only the rejection of claims 1, 2, 6, 8, 9, 12                



                                          3                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007