Ex parte EIMORI et al. - Page 1




                                    THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                                                      

                          The opinion in support of the decision being entered                                                                        
                          today (1) was not written for publication in a law                                                                          
                          journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the                                                                             
                          Board.                                                                                                                      
                                                                                                               Paper No. 25                           
                                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                                       
                                                                ____________                                                                          
                                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                                       
                                                            AND INTERFERENCES                                                                         
                                                                ____________                                                                          
                       Ex parte TAKAHISA EIMORI, SHINICHI SATOH, WATARU WAKAMIYA,                                                                     
                                             HIROJI OZAKI and YOSHINORI TANAKA                                                                        
                                                                ____________                                                                          
                                                           Appeal No. 94-4342                                                                         
                                                   Application No. 07/765,7711                                                                        
                                                                ____________                                                                          
                                                                   ON BRIEF                                                                           
                                                                ____________                                                                          
                 Before WEIFFENBACH, PAK and WARREN, Administrative Patent                                                                            
                 Judges.                                                                                                                              
                 PAK, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                                    


                                                           DECISION ON APPEAL                                                                         
                          This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner’s                                                                         
                 refusal to allow claims 10, 11, 14 and 15, which are all of                                                                          
                 the claims remaining in the application.                                                                                             

                          1Application for patent filed September 26, 1991.                                                                           
                 According to appellants, the application is a division of                                                                            
                 Application No. 07/391,008, filed August 9, 1989, now Patent                                                                         
                 No. 5,067,000, issued November 19, 1991.                                                                                             





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007