THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 25
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte TAKAHISA EIMORI, SHINICHI SATOH, WATARU WAKAMIYA,
HIROJI OZAKI and YOSHINORI TANAKA
____________
Appeal No. 94-4342
Application No. 07/765,7711
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before WEIFFENBACH, PAK and WARREN, Administrative Patent
Judges.
PAK, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner’s
refusal to allow claims 10, 11, 14 and 15, which are all of
the claims remaining in the application.
1Application for patent filed September 26, 1991.
According to appellants, the application is a division of
Application No. 07/391,008, filed August 9, 1989, now Patent
No. 5,067,000, issued November 19, 1991.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007