Ex parte MEEHAN - Page 2




          Appeal No. 94-4485                                                          
          Application No. 08/013,653                                                  


          in a concentration of 5-15% by weight, said solution having                 
          substantially no odor and being effective to neutralize the odor            
          of the fecal matter by absorption.                                          
               The examiner relies upon the following references as                   
          evidence of obviousness:                                                    
          Miller et al. (Miller)             3,675,625        July 11, 1972           
          Watanabe et al. (Watanabe)         4,218,432        Aug. 19, 1980           
          Meehan (Meehan '613)               4,567,613        Feb.  4, 1986           
          Meehan (Meehan '533)               4,633,533        Jan.  6, 1987           
          Sramek                             4,861,583        Aug. 29, 1989           
                                                      (filed Nov. 20, 1987)           
          The Condensed Chemical Dictionary 218, 514, 549-50 (8th ed. 1971)           
          Webster's Ninth New Collegiate Dictionary 742 (1986)                        
               Appellant's claimed invention is directed to a method of               
          neutralizing scatological odors which emanate from fecal matter.            
          The method comprises depositing into a receptacle which receives            
          the fecal matter a 5-15% by weight solution of menthol in an                
          alcohol.  The solution is substantially odorless but neutralizes            
          the odor of fecal matter by absorption thereof.                             
               Claim 1 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being                 
          unpatentable over Watanabe.  Claims, 1, 9, 37, 38 and 48 stand              
          rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Miller,           
          taken alone, or in combination with the Condensed Chemical                  
          Dictionary.  In addition, claims 1, 9-11, 32, 33, 37, 38 and 48             
          stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over             



                                         -2-                                          




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007