THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not
binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 16
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte BARRY S. KUTNER and DANIEL A. LATOWICKI
__________
Appeal No. 95-0084
Application 07/857,3291
__________
HEARD: January 15, 1998
__________
Before JOHN D. SMITH, GARRIS and OWENS, Administrative Patent
Judges.
GARRIS, Administrative Patent Judge.
1Application for patent filed March 25, 1992. According
to appellants, this application is a continuation-in-part of
Application 07/692,736 filed April 29, 1991, now U.S. Patent No.
5,413,757 issued May 9, 1996, which is a continuation of
Application 07/274,768 filed November 22, 1988, now U.S. Patent
No. 5,039,495 issued August 13, 1991, which is a continuation-in-
part of Application 07/184,246 filed April 21, 1988, now U.S.
Patent No. 5,019,344 issued May 28, 1991.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007