THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 34
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte HITOSHI MAKI
__________
Appeal No. 95-0262
Application 07/924,6061
__________
HEARD: Feb. 6, 1998
__________
Before MARC L. CAROFF, EDWARD C. KIMLIN and JOHN D. SMITH,
Administrative Patent Judges.
JOHN D. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the final
rejection of claims 6, 7, and 10 through 14.
1Application for patent filed July 27, 1992. According to
appellant, this application is a continuation of application
07/668,474, filed March 13, 1991, which is a continuation of
07/501,763, filed March 30, 1990, now abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007