THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not
binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 31
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte DAVID A. JOHNSON
__________
Appeal No. 95-0326
Application No. 07/877,2531
__________
ON BRIEF
__________
Before JOHN D. SMITH, GARRIS and WEIFFENBACH, Administrative
Patent Judges.
GARRIS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the final rejection of
claims 9 through 12, 14 through 19, 21, 22, 24 through 26, 28
through 31, 33 through 36, 38, 39 and 43. The only other claims
1Application for patent filed April 28, 1992. According
to appellant, this application is a continuation of Application
07/621,268, filed December 3, 1990, now abandoned; which is a
division of Application 07/331,250, filed March 29, 1989, now
abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007