THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 12
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte THOMAS W. ASTLE
________________
Appeal No. 95-0526
Application No. 08/038,5331
________________
ON BRIEF
________________
Before SOFOCLEOUS, WILLIAM F. SMITH and WEIMAR, Administrative
Patent Judges.
SOFOCLEOUS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1 to 4,
6, and 8 to 20, all the claims remaining in the application.
The subject matter on appeal is directed to a micropipette
tip rack, a pipettor system, and a method of loading onto a
pipettor a plurality of micropipette tips.
1Application for patent filed March 29, 1993.
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007