Ex parte ASTLE - Page 4




                Appeal No. 95-0526                                                                                                            
                Application No. 08/038,533                                                                                                    


                         (c) a horizontal internal support plate disposed in said                                                             
                                housing and spaced from said upper surface, said                                                              
                                internal support plate having defined therein a                                                               
                                plurality of openings to frictionally engagingly                                                              
                                accommodate therein the proximal, narrower, ends of                                                           
                                said upper portions of a said micropipette tips; and                                                          
                         (d) corresponding pairs of said openings in said internal                                                            
                                support plate and said upper surface being vertically                                                         
                                aligned coaxially so that said micropipette tips can be                                                       
                                supported in a vertical position in said package and                                                          
                                releasably held therein by interference fits at said                                                          
                                upper surface and said internal support plate.                                                                
                         The references relied upon by the Examiner are:                                                                      
                Scordato et al. (Scordato)                               3,853,217                     Dec. 10, 1974                          
                Citrin                                                   4,187,724                     Feb. 12, 1980                          
                Rainin et al. (Rainin)                                   4,676,377                     June 30, 1987                          
                Lyman et al. (Lyman)                                     4,824,642                     Apr. 25, 1989                          
                Freeman et al. (Freeman)                                 5,063,790                     Nov. 12, 1991                          
                Brochure, Cole-ParmerŪ Instrument Co. 1, 258, 268-69, 829                                                                     
                (1993-1994)2                                                                                                                  
                         After having reviewed the references in light of the                                                                 
                arguments raised by appellant, we find that we cannot sustain                                                                 
                these rejections for the reasons set forth in appellant’s brief.                                                              
                         It is axiomatic that a rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 103 must                                                          
                rest on a factual basis.  In re Warner, 379 F.2d 1011, 1017,                                                                  




                         2On pages 12 and 13 of the Answer, the examiner relies                                                               
                upon the Cole-Parmer reference to support his conclusion of                                                                   
                obviousness.  We have not considered this reference since it is                                                               
                not positively included in the statement of any of the rejections                                                             
                before us.  In re Hoch, 428 F.2d 1341, 1342 n.3, 166 USPQ 406,                                                                
                407, n. 3 (CCPA 1970).                                                                                                        
                                                                    -4-                                                                       




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007