Ex parte KATZ - Page 1




                                                       Paper No. 16                   

               THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                           
          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                  
          (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and                    
          (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                  

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                   _______________                                    
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                   _______________                                    
                                Ex parte ALAN J. KATZ                                 
                                   ______________                                     
                                 Appeal No. 95-0633                                   
                              Application 07/728,4261                                 
                                   _______________                                    
                                   ON BRIEF                                           
                                   _______________                                    
          Before HAIRSTON, KRASS, and JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent              
          Judges.                                                                     
          JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.                                   
                                                                                     


                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
          This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134                      
          from the examiner’s rejection of claims 22-25, which                        
          constitute all the claims remaining in the application.                     

               Application for patent filed July 11, 1991.1                                                                     
                                          1                                           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007