Ex parte KATZ - Page 2




          Appeal No. 95-0633                                                          
          Application 07/728,426                                                      


          The invention pertains to a method for training a neural                    
          network classifier.                                                         
          Representative claim 22 is reproduced as follows:                           
               22.  A method of training a neural network classifier,                 
          comprising the steps of:                                                    
               (a) providing a first set of target points Z , Z , ... Z1  2       L               
          in a feature space;                                                         
               (b) forming an estimated target probability density P on               
          said feature space from said target points Z , Z , ... Z ;1  2       L                    
               (c) providing a second set of target points W , W , ... W1  2       M              
          in said feature space;                                                      
               (d) defining a threshold T from the number of W  with                  
                                                              j                       
          P(W ) > T and the number of W  with P(W ) < T;j                      j          j                                     
               (e) providing a third set of points X , X , ... X  in said1  2       N                      
          feature space, and forming a set of pairs (X , Y ) where Y  isj  j         j                  
          “target” when P(X ) > T and Y  is “clutter” when P(X ) < T; andj           j                    j                        
               (f) using the pairs (X , Y ), (X , Y ), ..., (X , Y ), ...,1   1    2  2         j  j                      
          (X , Y ) as input/output pairs to train a neural networkN  N                                                                      
          classifier.                                                                 

               The examiner relies on no references.                                  
          Claims 22-25 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 101 as                        
          being directed to nonstatutory subject matter in the form of a              
          mathematical algorithm.  Claims 22-25 also stand rejected                   
          under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph, as failing to                      
          particularly point out and distinctly claim the invention.                  
                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007