Ex parte POZNIAK et al. - Page 2




          Appeal No. 95-0730                                                          
          Application 08/068,575                                                      


          24, 47 through 49, 51 and 53. No other claims are pending in the2                                              
          application.                                                                
               Appellants’ invention relates to a hazardous material                  
          treatment plant for processing hazardous material from a site.              
          According to claims 1 and 19, which are the only independent                
          claims on appeal, the treatment plant comprises a transportable             
          enclosure (150), a hazardous treatment facility (250) located in            
          the enclosure, a connection means (e.g., 252a) coupled to the               
          treatment facility and a connection port (100) located at the               
          site and coupled to the connection means. The connection port is            
          recited to comprise a means (e.g., 20, 21) for extracting the               
          hazardous material from ground soil and/or ground water at the              
          site for processing in the treatment facility, and the extracting           
          means, in turn, is recited to comprise one or more transport                
          lines extending into the ground at the site. Both of the                    
          independent claims on appeal recite that the treatment facility             
          may be one of a plurality of different types of treatment                   
          facilities and that one of the types of treatment facilities is             
          “optimized for treating a different concentration range of said             
          hazardous material than another of said types of hazardous                  

            2An amendment (paper No. 19) filed after the final rejection and          
            involving claims 1, 2, 11, 16, 19, 22, 47 through 49, 51 and 53 has been  
            entered by the examiner.                                                  
                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007