Appeal No. 95-0730
Application 08/068,575
applied in the rejection of claims 1 and 19.
Accordingly, we cannot agree that the combined teachings of
the applied references suggest the subject matter recited in
independent claims 1 and 19 and, hence, the subject matter
embraced by the appealed dependent claims, to warrant a
conclusion of obviousness under the test set forth in In re
Keller, 642 F.2d
413, 425, 208 USPQ 871, 881 (CCPA 1981). We therefore must
reverse the § 103 rejections of claims 1 through 7, 9 through 12,
16, 17, 19 through 24, 47 through 49, 51 and 53.
The examiner’s decision rejecting the appealed claims is
reversed.
REVERSED
IAN A. CALVERT )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
HARRISON E. McCANDLISH ) APPEALS AND
Senior Administrative Patent Judge ) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
8
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007