THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 39
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte MANFRED NIESSNER, NORBERT
GRUND, WILFRIED HEIDE DEX
and HEINRICH HARTMANN
_____________
Appeal No. 95-0757
Application 07/795,3071
______________
HEARD: December 10, 1997
_______________
Before JOHN D. SMITH, PAK and WARREN, Administrative Patent
Judges.
JOHN D. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the examiner’s final rejection of
claims 3, 5, 6, and 8 through 10.
Claims 8 and 9 are representative and are reproduced below:
8. A process for the preparation of a finely divided
1 Application for patent filed November 21, 1991. According to applicants,
the application is a continuation of Application 07/564,132, filed August 8,
1990.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007