Paper No. 18
THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
Ex parte MEINOLF KERSTING,
JUERGEN KERTH, KLAUS-DIETER HUNGENBERG,
AND PETER KOELLE
______________
Appeal No. 95-0996
Application 07/943,0251
_______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before JOHN D. SMITH, GARRIS and WALTZ, Administrative Patent
Judges.
WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
examiner’s final rejection of claims 1 and 2. Claims 3
through 5, the only
Application for patent filed September 10, 1992.1
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007