Ex parte KERSTING et al. - Page 11



          Appeal No. 95-0996                                                          
          Application 07/943,025                                                      

               The rejection of claims 1 and 2 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as               
          unpatentable over Tachikawa I is reversed.  Pursuant to the                 
          provisions of 37 CFR § 1.196(b), a new ground of rejection of               
          claims 1 and 2 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over                   
          Tachikawa II or EP ‘410 has been made.                                      
               This decision contains a new ground of rejection pursuant              
          to 37 CFR § 1.196(b)(amended effective Dec. 1, 1997, by final               
          rule notice, 62 Fed. Reg. 53,131, 53,197 (Oct. 10, 1997), 1203              
          Off. Gaz. Pat. & Trademark Office 63, 122 (Oct. 21, 1997)).                 
          37 CFR                                                                      
          § 1.196(b) provides that, “A new ground of rejection shall not              
          be considered final for purposes of judicial review.”                       
               37 CFR § 1.196(b) also provides that the appellant,                    
          WITHIN TWO MONTHS FROM THE DATE OF THE DECISION, must exercise              
          one of the following two options with respect to the new                    
          ground of rejection to avoid termination of proceedings                     
          (§ 1.197(c)) as                                                             
          to the rejected claims:                                                     
                    (1) Submit an appropriate amendment of the                        
               claims so rejected or a showing of facts relating to                   
               the claims so rejected, or both, and have the matter                   
               reconsidered by the examiner, in which event the                       
               application will be remanded to the examiner. . . .                    



                                         11                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007