THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 15
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte HOWARD R. LUCAS, ROBERT G. LEES,
HERBERT BURKHARD and DAVID A. LEY
________________
Appeal No. 95-1146
Application No. 07/913,1261
________________
ON BRIEF
________________
Before KIMLIN, WEIFFENBACH and PAK, Administrative Patent
Judges.
KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
1Application for patent filed July 13, 1992. According
to appellants, this application is a continuation of
Application
No. 07/473,134, filed January 30, 1990, now abandoned; which
is a continuation of Application No. 07/044,165, filed April
30, 1987; now abandoned.
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007