THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 21
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte TOSHIHIRO HANAMURA
____________
Appeal No. 95-1202
Application No. 08/106,1441
____________
HEARD: October 13, 1998
____________
Before DOWNEY, KIMLIN, and JOHN D. SMITH, Administrative
Patent Judges.
JOHN D. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal pursuant 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the final
rejection of claims 1-6.
Claim 1 is representative and is reproduced below:
1Application for patent filed August 13, 1998. According
to appellant, the appication is a continuation of Application
08/106,144, filed November 30, 1992; now abandoned.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007