Appeal No. 95-1202
Application No. 08/106,144
is clearly taught by Figure 6.5(a) of Towers, the examiner has
failed to adequately explain how this prior art embodiment
describes first, second and third electrodes at end edge
portions separately connected to first and second passive
elements in the manner required by the appealed claims.
The examiner's rejection of the appealed claims,
therefore, is reversed.
REVERSED
MARY F. DOWNEY )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
EDWARD C. KIMLIN ) APPEALS
Administrative Patent Judge ) AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
JOHN D. SMITH )
Administrative Patent Judge )
6
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007