Ex parte BOUILLON - Page 1




                                    THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                                                        

                          The opinion in support of the decision being entered                                                                          
                          today (1) was not written for publication in a law                                                                            
                          journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the                                                                               
                          Board.                                                                                                                        
                                                                                                                Paper No. 42                            
                                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                                        
                                                                 ____________                                                                           
                                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                                         
                                                            AND INTERFERENCES                                                                           
                                                                 ____________                                                                           
                                                      Ex parte GUNTER BOUILLON                                                                          
                                                                 ____________                                                                           
                                                           Appeal No. 95-1215                                                                           
                                                    Application No. 07/750,7771                                                                         
                                                                 ____________                                                                           
                                                       HEARD: January 16, 1998                                                                          
                                                                 ____________                                                                           
                 Before KIMLIN, PAK and WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                                            
                 PAK, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                                      
                                                           DECISION ON APPEAL                                                                           
                          This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner’s final                                                                     
                 rejection of claims 11 through 21, which are all of the claims                                                                         
                 pending in the application.                                                                                                            
                          Claims 11, 19, 20 and 21 are representative of the                                                                            
                 subject matter on appeal and read as follows:                                                                                          


                          1Application for patent filed August 22, 1991.  According                                                                     
                 to the appellant, the application is a continuation of                                                                                 
                 Application No. 07/466,398, filed July 27, 1990.                                                                                       





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007