Ex parte BOUILLON - Page 4




          Appeal No. 95-1215                                                          
          Application No. 07/750,777                                                  


          called  “an intended use” recited in claim 21 is not a process              
          within                                                                      
          the meaning of 35 U.S.C. 100 (b).  See, e.g., Ex parte Dunkix,              
          153 USPQ 678, 679 (Bd. App. 1967).                                          
               35 U.S.C. § 101 reads in relevant part:                                
                         Whoever invents or discovers any new . . .                   
                    process . . . may obtain a patent therefore. . .                  
                    .                                                                 

























                                          4                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007