THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 22
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte BIRNEY D. DAYTON
__________
Appeal No. 95-1461
Application 08/007,0601
__________
ON BRIEF
__________
Before KRASS, FLEMING and TORCZON, Administrative Patent Judges.
FLEMING, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of
claims 1 through 6, 8, 9 and 18 through 24, all of the claims
present in the application. Claims 10 through 17 have been
1Application for patent filed January 21, 1993. According
to appellant, this application is a divisional of application
07/614,230, filed November 15, 1990, now abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007