THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 11
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
Ex parte RICHARD J. MAZZA, THOMAS KING, and JOY STONE
_______________
Appeal No. 95-1743
Application 08/068,3451
_______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before STONER, Chief Administrative Patent Judge, McKELVEY,
Senior Administrative Patent Judge, and OWENS, Administrative
Patent Judge.
Per Curiam
DECISION ON APPEAL
This appeal is from the refusal of the examiner to allow
claims 13 through 16 as amended subsequent to the first action on
1 Application for patent filed May 27, 1993. According to
appellants this application is a division of Application 07/942,548
filed September 9, 1992.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007