Ex parte MAZZA et al. - Page 11

          Appeal No. 95-1743                                                         
          Application 08/068,345                                                     

               For the above reasons, we cannot sustain the examiner’s               
          rejection under 35 U.S.C. 102(b) of claims 13 through 16 as                
          anticipated by Edison.                                                     
                                      SUMMARY                                        
               The decision of the examiner is reversed.                             


                                      REVERSED                                       



                           ___________________________                               
                           BRUCE H. STONER, JR., Chief   )                           
                          Administrative Patent Judge   )                           
                           )                                                         
                           )                                                         
                           ___________________________   ) BOARD OF PATENT           
                           FRED E. McKELVEY, Senior      )                           
                           Administrative Patent Judge   )  APPEALS AND              
                           )                                                         
                           ) INTERFERENCES                                           
                           ___________________________ )                             
                           TERRY J. OWENS                )                           
                           Administrative Patent Judge   )                           











                                         11                                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November  3, 2007