THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 18
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte RICHARD A. MARTIN
__________
Appeal No. 95-1744
Application 08/216,5431
__________
ON BRIEF
__________
Before McCANDLISH Senior Administrative Patent Judge and
MEISTER and CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent Judges.
MEISTER, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Richard Martin (the appellant) appeals from the final
rejection of claims 8-14 and 16. Claim 15 has been indicated as
being allowable subject to the requirement that it be rewritten
to include all the subject matter of the claims from which it
1Application for patent filed March 23, 1994.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007