Appeal No. 95-1747
Application 08/047,994
include all of the elements as required and defined in
appellant's claims on appeal, it follows that we will not sustain
the examiner's rejection of independent claim 9 and dependent
claims 10 through 18 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) based on Gibilisco.
In light of the foregoing, it is clear that we have not
sustained either the examiner's rejection of appealed claims 9
through 18 under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph, or that of
claims 9 through 18 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b).
The decision of the examiner is accordingly reversed.
REVERSED
IRWIN CHARLES COHEN )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
JAMES M. MEISTER ) APPEALS AND
Administrative Patent Judge ) INTERFERENCES
)
10
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007