Ex parte YAMAGUCHI - Page 3




          Appeal No. 95-1750                                                            
          Application No. 07/891,123                                                    


          and X is a halogen atom, the quaternary ammonium hydroxide                    
          being included in an amount sufficient to dissolve an exposed                 
          portion of the photoresist and the quaternary ammonium                        
          halogenide being included in an amount sufficient to improve                  
          the selectivity in dissolution between an exposed portion and                 
          an unexposed portion of the photoresist by the quaternary                     
          ammonium hydroxide.                                                           
              The references relied upon by the examiner as evidence of                 
          obviousness are:                                                              
          Hilhorst et al.      3,607,271                Sep. 21, 1971                   
          (Hilhorst)                                                                    
          Guild                4,423,138                Dec. 27, 1983                   
          Tanaka et al.        4,873,177                Oct. 10, 1989                   
          (Tanaka)                                                                      
          Kato et al.          4,914,006                Apr.  3, 1990                   
          (Kato)                                                                        

              Claims 1 through 9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as                  
          being unpatentable over Guild, Kato, Hilhorst and Tanaka.                     
              We refer to the brief and reply brief and to the answer                   
          for a complete exposition of the opposing viewpoints expressed                
          by the appellant and the examiner concerning this rejection.                  
                                        OPINION                                         
              For the reasons set forth below, this rejection cannot be                 
          sustained.                                                                    


                                           3                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007