THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a
law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 18
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte BENEDICT A. ITRI
_____________
Appeal No. 95-1865
Application 07/970,8161
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before KRASS, BARRETT and FLEMING, Administrative Patent Judges.
KRASS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of claims 1 through 16, constituting all
the claims pending in the application.
The invention pertains to a timing recovery system for digital subscriber line transceivers.
More particularly, in a digital data communication system comprising two or more bidirectional
1Application for patent filed November 3, 1992.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007