Ex parte BEETCHER et al. - Page 4




           Appeal No. 95-1888                                                                     
           Application 08/011,042                                                                 


           the software.  Generally speaking, causing or controlling a                            
           computer’s operation or execution of programs there within is                          
           within the technological arts.  Specifically, granting or                              
           denying accessibility to data or software within or on a                               
           computer system is a practical application within 35 U.S.C. §                          
           101 of any mathematical operations so recited.  Between the                            
           preamble recitations and the recitations within the body of                            
           each independent claim, there is an integration of the                                 
           operations to control in some way the operation of computer                            
           programs within a given machine, namely the computer executing                         
           the software.                                                                          
           This reasoning is true even for the article of manufacture-                            
           type claims 16-19 involving a program product apparatus                                
           including the recitation of at least one software module                               
           recorded on recording media.                                                           
                 The examiner’s reasoning in part was based upon the so-                          
           called Freeman-Walter-Abele test.  However, the Court of                               
           Appeals for the Federal Circuit recently indicated in State                            
           Street Bank  & Trust Co. v. Signature Financial Group, Inc.,                           
           149 F.3d 1368,     1374, 47 USPQ2d 1596, 1601 (Fed. Cir.                               
           1998), that “application of the test could be misleading,                              
                                                4                                                 





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007