THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No.
15
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte YEN-JER SHIH and
ARTHUR B. PRUIKSMA
____________
Appeal No. 95-2011
Application No. 07/959,0111
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
1Application for patent filed October 9, 1992. According
to appellants, the application is a continuation-in-part of
Application 07/628,803, filed December 14, 1990, now U.S.
Patent No. 5,177,122, issued January 5, 1993 which is a
continuation- in-part of Application 07/389,012 filed August
2, 1989, now abandoned.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007