Appeal No. 95-2312
Application No. 07/897,870
The decision of the examiner is affirmed-in-part.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in
connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR
§ 1.136(a).
AFFIRMED-IN-PART
JOHN D. SMITH )
Administrative Patent Judge)
)
)
)
BRADLEY R. GARRIS ) BOARD OF PATENT
Administrative Patent Judge) APPEALS AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
CAMERON WEIFFENBACH )
Administrative Patent Judge)
3(...continued)
Specifically, the rejection sustained above includes nonargued
dependent claims certain of which may define features
corresponding to those defined by argued claims that were
determined to be patentable over the applied prior art. The
appellant and the examiner may wish to resolve this
inconsistency in any further prosecution that may occur.
11
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007