THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a
law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 34
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte KENJI OHTA, AKIRA TAKAHASHI,
YOSHITERU MURAKAMI, JUNICHIRO NAKAYAMA,
and TOMOYUKI MIYAKE
__________
Appeal No. 95-2427
Application 08/013,9871
___________
HEARD: December 9, 1998
___________
Before WEIFFENBACH, ELLIS and OWENS, Administrative Patent Judges.
WEIFFENBACH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner's final rejection of claims
1, 2 and 4-14, which are all of the claims remaining in the application. We reverse and enter a new ground
1Application for patent filed February 5, 1993. According to appellants, the application is a continuation of
Application 07/715,738, filed June 18, 1991, now abandoned, which is a continuation of Application 07/275,724 , filed
November 23, 1988, now abandoned.
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007