Appeal No. 95-2427
Application 08/013,987
Appeals and Interferences upon the same record....
Should the appellants elect to prosecute further before the primary examiner pursuant to 37 CFR
§ 1.196(b)(1), in order to preserve the right to seek review under 35 U.S.C. §§ 141 or 145 with respect
to the affirmed rejection, the effective date of the affirmance is deferred until conclusion of the prosecution
before the examiner unless, as a mere incident to the limited prosecution, the affirmed rejection is
overcome.
If the appellants elect prosecution before the examiner and this does not result in allowance of the
application, abandonment or a second appeal, this case should be returned to the Board of Patent Appeals
and Interferences for final action on the affirmed rejection, including any timely request for rehearing thereof.
REVERSED and 37 CFR § 1.196(b)
CAMERON WEIFFENBACH )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
JOAN ELLIS )
Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND
)
) INTERFERENCES
)
TERRY J. OWENS )
Administrative Patent Judge )
-9-
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007