Ex parte DUNN et al. - Page 1




                   THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                       
          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                  
          (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and                    
          (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                  
                                                               Paper No. 17           

                     UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                        
                                   _______________                                    
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                   _______________                                    
                               Ex parte PAUL F. DUNN                                  
                                and RANDALL C. BAUCK                                  
                                   _______________                                    
                                 Appeal No. 95-2439                                   
                              Application  08/080,3531                                
                                   _______________                                    
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                   _______________                                    
          Before KRASS, JERRY SMITH, and FLEMING, Administrative Patent               
          Judges.                                                                     
          KRASS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                         
                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of               
          claims 1 through 5 and 9 through 12.  Claim 13 has been                     
          determined by the examiner to contain allowable subject matter              
          and is not before us on appeal.                                             
                                                                                      
          1                                                                           
          1   Application for patent filed June 21, 1993.                             





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007