THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 17
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
Ex parte PAUL F. DUNN
and RANDALL C. BAUCK
_______________
Appeal No. 95-2439
Application 08/080,3531
_______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before KRASS, JERRY SMITH, and FLEMING, Administrative Patent
Judges.
KRASS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of
claims 1 through 5 and 9 through 12. Claim 13 has been
determined by the examiner to contain allowable subject matter
and is not before us on appeal.
1
1 Application for patent filed June 21, 1993.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007