THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 44
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte CHRISTIAN MELIN
_____________
Appeal No. 95-2633
Application 08/121,6631
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before McKELVEY, Senior Administrative Patent Judge, and SCHAFER and LEE, Administrative
Patent Judges.
SCHAFER, Administrative Patent Judge.
Decision on Appeal Under 35 U.S.C. § 134
1
Application for patent filed September 15, 1993. According to appellant, the application is a continuation of
Application 07/562,413, filed August 2, 1990, now abandoned, which is a continuation of Application 07/222,810, filed July 22,
1988, now abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007