Ex parte ONO - Page 2




          Appeal No. 95-2783                                         Page 2           
          Application 08/026,504                                                      
          claims are pending.  (Paper 7 at 1.)  We affirm subject to a                
          statement pursuant to 37 CFR § 1.196(c).                                    
               2.   The application on appeal was filed on 4 March 1993.              
          (Paper 1 at 1.)  Appellant claims the benefit of Japanese kokai             
          Hei4-070863.  (Paper 1, Comb. Decl.; Paper 2.)  Fuji Photo                  
          Optical K.K. is the real party in interest.                                 
               3.   The application is entitled "Zoom lens optical system".           
          The subject matter of the invention "relates to a zoom lens                 
          optical system provided with an optical path splitting means for            
          splitting a light beam, which has passed through a negative film,           
          into light beams following optical paths heading towards a                  
          printing section and a photometric section."  (Paper 1 at 1.)  In           
          particular, the specification details a                                     
               zoom lens optical system [that] satisfies the                          
               conditions                                                             
                              1.2 fw < f1 < 2.4 fw               ... (1)              
                              0.4 fw < f3/f2 < 0.8 fw            ... (2)              
               where fw is a number equal to the minimum focal length                 
               of the whole system in millimeters, f1 represents the                  
               composite focal length of the first-lens set, f2                       
               represents the composite focal length of the second-                   
               lens set, and f3 represents the composite focal length                 
               of the third-lens set.                                                 
          (Paper 1 at 3-4 (amendments included).)  For the appeal,                    
          Appellant has amended claim 1 to state formula (2) in words as              
          follows:                                                                    
                    . . . wherein the zoom lens optical system                        
               satisfies the conditions                                               






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007