Appeal No. 95-2783 Page 6
Application 08/026,504
B. Enablement
5. Since our affirmance of the indefiniteness rejection
disposes of all claims on appeal, we need not separately reach
the merits of the enablement rejection. Moreover, the stated
Rule 196(c) amendment will cure the problem underlying this
rejection.
DECISION AND RULE 196(c) STATEMENT
The examiner's rejection of claims 1-5 under section 112 as
indefinite is affirmed. Claims 1-5 may be allowed if claim 1 is
amended to recite the formula (2) element as follows:
"0.4 fw/mm < f3/f2 < 0.8 fw/mm".
We set a time period in which Appellant may file an amendment for
the purpose stated in section 1.196(c) to expire two months from
the date of this decision. No time period for taking subsequent
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007